Elon Musk‘s strategy to leverage resources across his business empire, including Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, has sparked investor concerns, particularly after a recent controversy involving chatbot Grok.

Musk is promoting a ‘Muskonomy’ strategy that would allow investors to invest in his various businesses, which include SpaceX, X, xAI, and The Boring Company, reported Business Insider. He has even promised to prioritize “longtime shareholders” if any of his companies go public. This strategy could potentially help Tesla meet its AI demands for autonomous driving by leveraging resources across Musk’s other companies.

However, this strategy carries notable risks. For example, Grok's recent controversy over anti-Semitic content on X has raised alarms about incorporating the chatbot into Tesla's electric vehicles. Additionally, Musk's move last year to redirect a $500 million shipment of Nvidia chips—originally meant for Tesla—to X and xAI triggered concern among investors. Musk defended the move, saying it was beneficial for Tesla as the company lacked the infrastructure to utilize the chips at the time.

Analyst Gadjo Sevilla from EMARKETER, expressed concern about Musk’s strategy of “cannibalizing one business to prop up another one could take its toll.” This could potentially delay innovation at Tesla, warned the analyst.

Meanwhile, Garrett Nelson, senior VP and equity analyst at CFRA Research, pointed out that other companies usually conduct the interplay under “one corporate umbrella.” However, with Musk, “the relationship and interplay between his private companies and a public company (Tesla)” is the key distinguishing factor.

Unlock our premium newsletters for free - just DM or comment the word “news.”

In a move that has left Wall Street stunned and Silicon Valley buzzing, Elon Musk—tech’s most unpredictable titan—has unveiled a new strategy that could forever alter the landscape of American business: the “Muskonomy.” Leveraging the power and resources of his sprawling business empire, which includes Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, X (formerly Twitter), and The Boring Company, Musk is betting big on synergy across his companies. But as the lines blur between his public and private ventures, investors are starting to ask: Is Musk building the future, or playing with fire?

**The Rise of the Muskonomy**

For years, Musk has been the poster child for innovation, disruption, and risk-taking. But even by his standards, the “Muskonomy” is a bold new frontier. The plan? To allow investors to buy into a single, interconnected ecosystem of Musk’s companies, rather than just one at a time. According to a bombshell report from Business Insider, Musk has even floated the idea of prioritizing “longtime shareholders” if any of his companies go public—a tantalizing prospect for die-hard Musk fans.

But there’s more. By pooling resources—whether it’s sharing AI chips, engineering talent, or proprietary data—Musk believes he can accelerate progress across the board. Tesla’s ambitions for full self-driving cars, for example, could be turbocharged by leveraging AI breakthroughs from xAI or hardware from SpaceX. In theory, it’s a masterstroke: why let your companies compete for resources when they can join forces and leave rivals in the dust?

**A Controversial Power Play**

However, not everyone is cheering. In fact, some investors are terrified.

The first cracks appeared with the recent Grok controversy. Grok, an AI chatbot developed by Musk’s xAI, was embroiled in scandal after anti-Semitic content surfaced on X, the social media platform Musk acquired and rebranded from Twitter. The incident sent shockwaves through the tech world, raising urgent questions about the wisdom of integrating Grok into Tesla’s vehicles. Could a chatbot that spews hate speech really be trusted to interact with millions of drivers?

But the real bombshell dropped when Musk redirected a $500 million shipment of Nvidia AI chips—originally earmarked for Tesla—over to X and xAI. Investors were outraged. Tesla’s stock wobbled. Musk, never one to back down from a fight, defended the move by claiming Tesla didn’t yet have the infrastructure to use the chips. But to many, it looked like Musk was robbing Peter to pay Paul—taking from Tesla to prop up his newer ventures.

**“Cannibalizing One Business to Feed Another”**

The backlash was swift and fierce. Gadjo Sevilla, a senior analyst at EMARKETER, issued a stark warning: “Cannibalizing one business to prop up another could take its toll.” He cautioned that Tesla’s innovation pipeline could slow to a trickle if Musk keeps siphoning off its resources.

Garrett Nelson, senior VP and equity analyst at CFRA Research, pointed out that most conglomerates manage resource-sharing under a single corporate umbrella. But Musk’s empire is different. “The relationship and interplay between his private companies and a public company (Tesla) is the key distinguishing factor,” Nelson said. In other words, while other CEOs might shuffle assets between subsidiaries, Musk is juggling public and private interests in full view of the markets. The risks are enormous.

**The Perils of Empire-Building**

For Tesla shareholders, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Tesla is a public company, subject to strict oversight and transparency requirements. SpaceX, xAI, and The Boring Company are private, with far fewer rules. By moving resources between these entities, Musk is operating in a legal and ethical gray area. Is he acting in the best interests of Tesla shareholders, or using Tesla’s assets to boost his private holdings?

The Grok scandal has made these questions impossible to ignore. If Musk’s AI chatbot can’t be trusted on X, why should anyone believe it’s safe for Tesla drivers? And if Musk can reroute $500 million in chips away from Tesla with a snap of his fingers, what’s to stop him from making even bigger moves in the future?

Some analysts warn that Musk’s empire-building could backfire spectacularly. “When you’re running this many companies, there’s always a risk of conflicts of interest,” said one veteran investor. “At some point, you have to ask: Where does Elon’s loyalty really lie?”

**Fans and Critics Clash Online**

Predictably, the internet has exploded with debate. Musk’s loyal army of fans—“the Musketeers”—have rushed to his defense, arguing that only Musk has the vision and guts to pull off such an audacious strategy. They point to his track record: transforming electric cars from a punchline to a global phenomenon, launching reusable rockets, and now, pushing the frontiers of AI.

But critics say Musk is overreaching. “He’s spreading himself too thin,” tweeted one prominent tech journalist. “You can’t run five companies at once and expect everything to go smoothly.” Others accuse Musk of using Tesla’s public capital to bankroll his riskier, less regulated ventures—a charge that could have serious legal implications if proved.

**The Future of the Muskonomy**

As the controversy rages, one thing is clear: Musk’s “Muskonomy” is a high-wire act with no safety net. If it works, Musk could create the world’s first true tech super-conglomerate, with synergies that leave Apple, Google, and Amazon in the dust. But if it fails, the fallout could be catastrophic—not just for Musk, but for millions of investors who have bet their savings on his vision.

For now, all eyes are on Musk. Will he double down on his empire-building, or pull back in the face of mounting criticism? Will Tesla’s innovation engine keep humming, or will it sputter as resources are siphoned away? And most importantly, will Musk’s audacious gamble pay off—or will it go down as one of the greatest business blunders of the 21st century?

One thing’s for sure: in the world of Elon Musk, nothing is ever boring. And with the future of the Muskonomy hanging in the balance, the next move could change everything.

 

*Want more shocking business stories? DM or comment “news” to unlock our premium newsletters—free for a limited time!*